Most importantly from a manufacturer's perspective, it means a somewhat different, and hopefully more manageable, supply chain. Since Arm has no interest in marketing itself to end users, you don't typically hear much about "Arm Inside. Equally important, however, is the fact that an Arm chip is not necessarily a central processor.
Depending on the design of its system, it can be the heart of a device controller, a microcontroller MCU , or some other subordinate component in a system. Apple Silicon is the phrase Apple presently uses to describe its own processor production, beginning in June with Apple's announcement of the replacement of its x86 Mac processor line. In its place, in Mac laptop units that are reportedly already shipping, will be a new system-on-a-chip called A12Z, code-named "Bionic," produced by Apple using bit component designs licensed to it by Arm Holdings, Ltd.
In this case, Arm isn't the designer, but the producer of the instruction set around which Apple makes its original design. For MacOS 11 to continue to run software compiled for Intel processors, under an Arm SoC, the new system will run a kind of "just-in-time" instruction translator called Rosetta 2. Rather than run an old MacOS image in a virtual machine, the new OS will run a live x86 machine code translator that re-fashions x86 code into what Apple now calls Universal 2 binary code -- an intermediate-level code that can still be made to run on older Intel-based Macs -- in real-time.
That code will run in what sources outside of Apple call an "emulator," but which isn't really an emulator in that it doesn't simulate the execution of code in an actual, physical machine there is no "Universal 2" chip. The first results of independent performance benchmarks comparing an iPad Pro using the A12Z chip planned for the first Arm-based Macs, against Microsoft Surface models, looked promising.
Geekbench results as of the time of this writing gave the Bionic-powered tablet a multi-core processing score of higher is better , versus for the Pentium-powered Surface Pro X, and for the Core i5-powered Surface Pro 6. Apple's newly claimed ability to produce its own SoC for Mac, just as it does for iPhone and iPad, could save the company over time as much as 60 percent on production costs, according to its own estimates. Of course, Apple is typically tight-lipped as to how it arrives at that estimate, and how long such savings will take to be realized.
The other co-partners at that time were the Arm concept's originator, Acorn Computers Ltd. Today, Arm Holdings is a wholly-owned subsidiary of SoftBank, which announced its intent to purchase the licensor in July At the time, the acquisition deal was the largest for a Europe-based technology firm. The deal is pending regulatory review in the European Union, United States, Japan, and China, in separate processes that may yet conclude in In a press conference following the announcement, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang told reporters his intention is to maintain Arm's current business model, without influencing its current mix of partners.
What's unclear at the time the deal was announced is what a prospective partner would want with a GPU design, besides the opportunity to compete against Nvidia.
Arm designs are created with the intention of being mixed-and-matched in various configurations, depending on the unique needs of its partners.
Nvidia's designs are expressly intended for these particular foundries -- for instance, to take advantage of Samsung's Extreme Ultra-Violet EUV lithography process. As of March 30, , there officially will have been nine generations of Arm processor architecture since the company's inception.
When a company manufactures its own processors, or licenses their manufacture exclusively to other foundries to be marketed in the licensee's name only, the design is typically based on a reference implementation that is easily varied to suit performance parameters. For example, on-chip static memory caches are added or left out, cores are appropriated but only included in premium models, and memory bandwidth may be artificially limited for budget-class processors. In Arm's case, its architecture is like an encyclopedia of functions.
Each class of processor core brings both basic and specialist functions to the table. Each licensee, or "partner," builds a design around the core series that provides the functions it needs. The partner's design is then certified by Arm as abiding by its guidelines, as upholding the Arm engineers' security principles and original design intent, and perhaps most importantly, as being capable of running software produced for that processor's design generation.
No specialization introduced by the partner should render the processor incapable of running software that Arm has already certified as executable on its designated core class. Once certified, Arm gives its partner license to produce its design with Arm's intellectual property IP included, either through its own foundries or, as is more often the case, by outsourcing production to a commercial foundry such as Foxconn or TSMC.
Conceptually similar to the original idea of containers, Armv9's realms are isolated execution threads that have no connection to any threads in which the operating system, or any system services, would be run. Realms' objective is to render the most common type of processor exploit on x86 architectures, functionally impossible on Armv9: the stack overflow.
The tactic for such an exploit is to use ordinary instructions to trigger an error condition, then while the processor is cleaning up, force bytes that had been delivered as data, to be executed as privileged code while the processor is incapable of checking for privilege. Theoretically, so long as a thread runs in a discrete Armv9 realm, it can't trip any of the registers relating to the system, or to any hypervisors supporting virtual machines, even if it triggers an error condition for itself.
This ensures the protection of the employer's data, even if the phone's operating system is compromised. By preventing the theft of commercially viable algorithms and data, and ensuring that mission-critical supervisory controls needed by the employer cannot be subverted, it's no longer necessary for drivers or couriers to be provided with dedicated corporate devices.
In other words, if the Realms initiative is successful, the isolation for applications that employers seek in purchasing separate phones, can be obtained instead through a single smartphone whose processor works as though it were two or more isolated components. Realms is part of a corporate-wide Arm initiative to implement so-called Confidential Compute Architecture across the board.
But Realms alone could lead to a market advantage for Arm processor-driven devices, compared with competitors. While others may continue to push for the speed and performance lead, Arm could offer security-conscious customers an alternative for which they might be willing to trade off some performance gains. Its purpose is to leverage the efficiency of simplicity, with the goal of rendering all of the processor's functionality on a single chip.
Keeping a processor's instruction set small means it can be coded using a fewer number of bits, thus reducing memory consumption as well as execution cycle time. Back in , students at the University of California, Berkeley, were able to produce the first working RISC architectures by judiciously selecting which functions would be used most often, and rendering only those in hardware -- with the remaining functions rendered as software.
Indeed, that's what makes an SoC with a set of small cores feasible: relegating as much functionality to software as possible. The power of x86 comes from being able to accomplish so much with just a single instruction. For instance, with Intel's vector processing , it's possible to execute 16 single-precision math operations, or 8 double-precision operations, simultaneously; here, the vector acts as a kind of "skewer," if you will, poking through all the operands in a parallel operation and racking them up.
That makes complex math easier, at least conceptually. With a RISC system, math operations are decomposed into fundamentals. Everything that would happen automatically with a CISC architecture -- for example, clearing up the active registers when a process is completed — takes a full, recorded step with RISC. However, because fewer bits binary digits are required to encapsulate the entire RISC instruction set, it may end up taking about as many bits in the end to encode a sequence of fundamental operations in a RISC processor -- perhaps even fewer -- than a complex CISC instruction where all the properties and arguments are piled together in a big clump.
Intel can, and has, demonstrated very complex instructions with higher performance statistics than the same processes for Arm processors, or other RISC chips. But sometimes such performance gains come at an overall performance cost for the rest of the system, making RISC architectures somewhat more efficient than CISC at general-purpose tasks.
Then there's the issue of customization. Intel enhances its more premium CPUs with functionality by way of programs that would normally be rendered as software, but are instead embedded as microcode. These are routines designed to be quickly executed at the machine code level, and that can be referenced by that code indirectly, by name. This way, for example, a program that needs to invoke a common method for decrypting messages on a network can address very fast processor code, very close to where that code will be executed.
Conveniently, many of the routines that end up in microcode are the ones often employed in performance benchmarks. These microcode routines are stored in read-only memory ROM near the x86 cores. An Arm processor, by contrast, does not use digital microcode in its on-die memory. The current implementation of Arm's alternative is a concept called custom instructions [ PDF ]. It enables the inclusion of completely client-customizable, on-die modules, whose logic is effectively "pre-decoded.
All the program has to do to invoke this logic is cue up a dependent instruction for the processor core, which passes control to the custom module as though it were another arithmetic logic unit ALU. Arm asks its partners who want to implement custom modules to present it with a configuration file, and map out the custom data path from the core to the custom ALU.
Using just these items, the core can determine the dependencies and instruction interlocking mechanisms for itself. This is how an Arm partner builds up an exclusive design for itself, using Arm cores as their starting ingredients. Although Arm did not create the concept of RISC, it had a great deal to do with realizing the concept, and making it publicly available.
One branch of the original Berkeley architecture to have emerged unto its own is RISC-V, whose core specification was made open source under the Creative Commons 4. An xbased PC or server is built to some common set of specifications for performance and compatibility.
Any more, such a PC isn't so much designed as assembled. This keeps costs low for hardware vendors, but it also relegates most of the innovation and feature-level premiums to software, and perhaps a few nuances of implementation. The x86 device ecosystem is populated by interchangeable parts, at least insofar as architecture is concerned granted, AMD and Intel processors have not been socket-compatible for quite some time.
The Arm ecosystem is populated by some of the same components, such as memory, storage, and interfaces, but otherwise by complete systems designed and optimized for the components they utilize.
This does not necessarily give Arm devices, appliances, or servers any automatic advantage over Intel and AMD. Intel and x86 have been dominant in the computing processor space for the better part of four decades, and Arm chips have existed in one form or another for nearly all of that time -- since Its entire history has been about finding success in markets that x86 technology had not fully exploited or in which x86 was showing weakness, or in markets where x86 simply cannot be adapted.
For tablet computers, more recently in data center servers, and soon once again in desktop and laptop computers, the vendor of an Arm-based device or system is no longer relegated to being just an assembler of parts.
This makes any direct, unit-to-unit comparison of Arm vs. The class of processor now known as GPU originated as a graphics co-processor for PCs, and is still prominently used for that purpose.
However, largely due to the influence of Nvidia in the artificial intelligence space, the GPU has come to be regarded as one class of general-purpose accelerator , as well as a principal computing component in supercomputers -- being coupled with, rather than subordinate to, supercomputers. The GPU's strong suit is its ability to execute many clusters of instructions, or threads , in parallel, greatly accelerating many academic tasks.
Arm does produce a reference design for GPUs to be used in graphics processing, called Mali. It makes this design available for licensing to makers of value-oriented, Android-based tablets and smart TVs. Low-price online electronics retailer Kogan. In March , Arm indicated its intention to continue producing GPU reference designs, unaltered from their original architecture, well after Arm's acquisition by Nvidia is completed. Previously, in November , Nvidia announced its introduction of a reference platform enabling systems architects to couple Arm-based server designs with Nvidia's own GPU accelerators.
Regional » Airport Codes. Business » Accounting. Miscellaneous » Unclassified. Miscellaneous » Unclassified -- and more Computing » Networking -- and more Miscellaneous » USPS -- and more Governmental » Military. Business » Management.
We're doing our best to make sure our content is useful, accurate and safe. If by any chance you spot an inappropriate comment while navigating through our website please use this form to let us know, and we'll take care of it shortly. Forgot your password? Retrieve it. Abbreviation » Term. Term » Abbreviation.
Word in Term. Term » Abbr. Filter by: Select category from list What does ARM mean? Couldn't find the full form or full meaning of ARM? Discuss these ARM abbreviations with the community: 1 Comment.
Notify me of new comments via email. Rajkumar Palnati. Like Reply Report 1 7 years ago. Yakubu Shehu. Like Reply Report 1 5 years ago.
Cancel Report. Create a new account. Log In. Know what is ARM? Got another good explanation for ARM? Don't keep it to yourself! Add it HERE!
0コメント